Date: December 17th, 2020
Facilitator: Katie
Participants: Bruno, Katie, Vasileios, Nick
Agenda
- check in
- Prolonged but nice!
- Overview of Nathan Call
- Important to make the governance process clear in Karrot
- Think about what in integrated into the code
- Reflection on the conflict resolution
- Talk about next steps
- Finish sketching later
- Now we move on to Stage 3 - Decide
- Use heat map and dote to decide what needs more discussion
- Do we need to check if there is anything that is still missing?
- Stage 3: Decide
- Bruno is interested in working with most elemets, maybe we can chose one decision making model, and skip library for now.
- Nick likes the vision text box, he had also selected the library but is up for having it as an add-on later. A light weight editing and approval would be useful
- Vasileios thinks its import to ask who will test the prototype, if two groups will test it would be nice to integrate intergroup learning, I think all groups should test it. In agreement
- Katie try one decision making model or both and do some A/B testing. Categories are interesting and working with the vision text boxes.
- TRY: Threshold of approval based on the trust Karrot systems. Reactions and temperature check. A multi-stage process, 1. Temperature Check (If all positive or neutral it gets approved) 2. If negative reactions occur then it need approval from 3ish highly trusted members.
- Move on to prototyping, choose what to prototype
- things not represented in the sketch right now:
- democratic flow around agreement proposals
- Build a facade and try to test with multiple groups, Bruno and Katie could test in their groups and then do others over call
- Work in tandem, coders start on one page while others work with IA/WIREFRAMES/Mockups
- things not represented in the sketch right now:
- Next meeting
- 30/12
- Facilitator next meeting:
- Bruno
- check out
